1.png


2.png


<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/download-cloud.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/download-cloud.svg" width="40px" /> Download PDF

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/x.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/x.svg" width="40px" /> Share on twitter/X

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Shareable images

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/inbox.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/inbox.svg" width="40px" /> Sign up for email updates

</aside>

CONTENTS

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Cutting income taxes

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Cutting corporation tax

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Scrapping inheritance tax

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Equalising capital gains tax rates

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Removing non-domiciled status

</aside>

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-down-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Increasing resources for HMRC

</aside>


CUTTING INCOME TAXES

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Top

</aside>

1.png

SCIENTIFIC NAME: Burdensis reduciarum

STATUS: Endemic and widely distributed

Now hard to miss, especially shortly before fiscal events. Increasingly common since the late 1970s. Makes a distinctive ‘laffer’ noise, repeated insistently and shrilly to compensate for a weak evidence base. Feeds mostly on unsubstantiated claims that it will lead us to the sunny uplands of economic growth rather than tearing a massive hole in the public finances. Expects to be popular with the public but is liked by fewer than one in six people because most of us would rather have functioning public services, thank you very much.


CUTTING CORPORATION TAX

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Top

</aside>

2.png

SCIENTIFIC NAME: Disputus incidencia

STATUS: Regular visitor

Like its income tax cousin, increasingly easy to spot over the last forty years, bolstered by regular migration from the United States. Lives in a range of habitats, from rural areas to corporate boardrooms. Attracted to shiny promises that cutting corporate tax rates will benefit workers and employees instead of wealthy shareholders, but many scientists are sceptical. Has a harsh, grating call whose high volume causes many to overestimate its ubiquity. Consistently unpopular with the public, because corporation tax is one of the most popular taxes.


SCRAPPING INHERITANCE TAX

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Top

</aside>

3.png

SCIENTIFIC NAME: Levium opprobrium

STATUS: Under threat

Appears, wraith-like, in sections of the media whenever an election or budget is on the horizon. Feeds on a widespread misapprehension that inheritance tax affects averagely wealthy people; in fact it is only paid by the richest 4%. While 55% believe in tax-free inheritance in principle, 78% think inheritances should be taxed when given the figures. Only 14% prioritise cutting inheritance tax. Just 16% want to keep reliefs that save the wealthiest estates £1.5 billion every year. Twenty years ago, scrapping this tax was an appeal to aspiration; now it is associated with inequality, and so is widely seen as politically unwise.


EQUALISING CAPITAL GAINS TAX RATES*

<aside> <img src="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" alt="https://super.so/icon/dark/arrow-up-circle.svg" width="40px" /> Top

</aside>

8.png

SCIENTIFIC NAME: Expecto revenonum

STATUS: Fleeting seasonal visitor

Resident in the UK from 1988 to 1998 thanks to Nigel Lawson, but not seen since after being mercilessly hunted by Gordon Brown. There are widespread calls for its return from experts and two-thirds of the public also want to see it back in our skies, not least because its absence means that some people earning millions of pounds every year in the form of capital gains (e.g. Rishi Sunak) pay an effective tax rate similar to someone on an average UK salary (and capital gains are heavily skewed towards the wealthiest people and areas), while equalising it would raise billions.

* With tax rates on employment income